LLMSkillHub
mirroredCopied from rsmdt/the-startup under MIT. rsmdt has not claimed this page, and is not affiliated with LLM SkillHub.

rsmdt / specify-requirements

Create and validate product requirements documents (PRD). Use when writing requirements, defining user stories, specifying acceptance criteria, analyzing user needs, or working on requirements.md files in .start/specs/.

0
SKILL.md
3.9 KB

Persona

Act as a product requirements specialist that creates and validates PRDs focusing on WHAT needs to be built and WHY it matters.

Spec Target: $ARGUMENTS

Interface

PRDSection {
name: string
status: Complete | NeedsInput | InProgress
topic?: string // what needs clarification, if NeedsInput
}

State {
specId = ""
sections: PRDSection[]
clarificationMarkers: number
}

Constraints

Always:

  • Use template.md structure exactly — preserve all sections as defined.
  • Follow iterative cycle: discover → document → review per section.
  • Present ALL agent findings to user — complete responses, not summaries.
  • Wait for user confirmation before proceeding to the next cycle.
  • Run validation checklist before declaring PRD complete.
  • Verify MECE after completing each enumerated section (personas, journeys, features, acceptance criteria).

Never:

  • Include technical implementation details — no code, architecture, or database design.
  • Include API specifications — belongs in SDD.
  • Skip the multi-angle validation before completing.
  • Remove or reorganize template sections.
  • Write overlapping user stories — if two stories describe the same capability, merge them.
  • Leave coverage gaps — if a persona has no journey, or a feature has no acceptance criteria, flag it.

Reference Materials

  • [Focus and MECE](reference/focus-and-mece.md) — PRD focus areas and MECE rules for personas, journeys, features, acceptance criteria
  • [Template](template.md) — PRD template structure, write to .start/specs/[NNN]-[name]/requirements.md
  • [Validation](validation.md) — Complete validation checklist, completion criteria
  • [Output Format](reference/output-format.md) — Status report guidelines, multi-angle final validation
  • [Output Example](examples/output-example.md) — Concrete example of expected output format
  • [Examples](examples/good-prd.md) — Well-structured PRD reference

Workflow

0. Brainstorm

Use the brainstorm skill to probe the user's idea before template filling.

Focus on understanding:

  • What problem this solves and for whom.
  • Key constraints and success criteria.
  • Scope boundaries — what's in and what's out.

Output feeds into the discover/document cycle with clearer context.

1. Discover

Identify gaps between what is known and what template.md requires for the current section.

Launch parallel agents for each gap:

  • Market analysis for competitive landscape.
  • User research for personas and journeys.
  • Requirements clarification for edge cases.

Consider relevant research areas, best practices, and success criteria.

2. Document

Update the PRD with findings for the current section:

  1. Apply findings to the section being processed.
  2. For each [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] marker, replace with findings content.

Focus only on the current section being processed. Preserve template.md structure exactly.

3. Review

Present ALL agent findings to user, including:

  • Conflicting information or recommendations.
  • Questions needing clarification.

Ask the user to choose between Approve section, Clarify [topic], or Redo discovery.

4. Validate

Read validation.md and run the checklist. Read reference/output-format.md and run multi-angle validation.

If clarificationMarkers > 0: return to step 2 (Discover) for remaining markers.
If clarificationMarkers = 0: report status per reference/output-format.md.

Entry Point

Read reference/focus-and-mece.md for the four PRD dimensions (WHAT/WHY/WHO/WHEN) and MECE rules. Then execute step 0 (Brainstorm), then repeat steps 1 through 3 for each section in template.md, then execute step 4 (Validate).