LLMSkillHub
mirroredCopied from LeonChaoX/qinyan-academic-skills under MIT. LeonChaoX has not claimed this page, and is not affiliated with LLM SkillHub.

leonchaox / medical-imaging-review

Write comprehensive literature reviews for medical imaging AI research. Use when writing survey papers, systematic reviews, or literature analyses on topics like segmentation, detection, classification in CT, MRI, X-ray, ultrasound, or pathology imaging. Triggers on requests for "review paper", "survey", "literature review", "综述", "systematic review", or mentions of writing academic reviews on deep learning for medical imaging.

0
SKILL.md
4.4 KB

Medical Imaging AI Literature Review Skill

Write comprehensive literature reviews following a systematic 7-phase workflow.

Quick Start

  1. Initialize project with three core files:

    • CLAUDE.md - Writing guidelines and terminology
    • IMPLEMENTATION_PLAN.md - Staged execution plan
    • manuscript_draft.md - Main manuscript
  2. Follow the 7-phase workflow (see [references/WORKFLOW.md](references/WORKFLOW.md))
  3. Use domain-specific templates (see [references/DOMAINS.md](references/DOMAINS.md))

Core Principles

Writing Style

  • Hedging language: "may", "suggests", "appears to", "has shown promising results"
  • Avoid absolutes: Never say "X is the best method"
  • Citation support: Every claim needs reference
  • Limitations: Each method section needs a Limitations paragraph

Required Elements

  • Key Points box (3-5 bullets) after title
  • Comparison table for each major section
  • Performance metrics: Dice (0.XXX), HD95 (X.XX mm)
  • Figure placeholders with detailed captions
  • References: 80-120 typical, organized by topic

Paragraph Structure

Topic sentence (main claim)
  → Supporting evidence (citations + data)
  → Analysis (critical evaluation)
  → Transition to next paragraph

Literature Sources

Use multi-source strategy for comprehensive coverage:

SourceBest ForTools
ArXivLatest DL methods, preprintssearch_papers, read_paper
PubMedClinical validation, peer-reviewedpubmed_search_articles
ZoteroExisting library, organized refszotero_search_items

For MCP configuration details, see [references/MCP_SETUP.md](references/MCP_SETUP.md).


Standard Review Structure

# [Title]: State of the Art and Future Directions

## Key Points
- [3-5 bullets summarizing main findings]

## Abstract

## 1. Introduction
### 1.1 Clinical Background
### 1.2 Technical Challenges
### 1.3 Scope and Contributions

## 2. Datasets and Evaluation Metrics
### 2.1 Public Datasets (Table 1)
### 2.2 Evaluation Metrics

## 3. Deep Learning Methods
### 3.1 [Category 1]
### 3.2 [Category 2]
(Table 2: Method Comparison)

## 4. Downstream Applications

## 5. Commercial Products & Clinical Translation (Table 3)

## 6. Discussion
### 6.1 Current Limitations
### 6.2 Future Directions

## 7. Conclusion

## References

Method Description Template

### 3.X [Method Category]

[1-2 paragraph introduction with motivation]

**[Method Name]:** [Author] et al. [ref] proposed [method], which [innovation]:
- [Key component 1]
- [Key component 2]
Achieves Dice of X.XX on [dataset].

**Limitations:** Despite advantages, [category] methods face:
(1) [limit 1]; (2) [limit 2].

Citation Patterns

# Data citation
"...achieved Dice of 0.89 [23]"

# Method citation
"Gu et al. [45] proposed..."

# Multi-citation
"Several studies demonstrated... [12, 15, 23]"

# Comparative
"While [12] focused on..., [15] addressed..."

Reference Files

FilePurpose
[references/WORKFLOW.md](references/WORKFLOW.md)Detailed 7-phase workflow
[references/TEMPLATES.md](references/TEMPLATES.md)CLAUDE.md and IMPLEMENTATION_PLAN.md templates
[references/DOMAINS.md](references/DOMAINS.md)Domain-specific method categories
[references/MCP_SETUP.md](references/MCP_SETUP.md)MCP server configuration
[references/QUALITY_CHECKLIST.md](references/QUALITY_CHECKLIST.md)Pre-submission quality checklist